Shameer Modongal
Shameer Modongal is a Research Scholar, in the Centre for International Politics, Organization and Disarmament in the School of International Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Email: shameernoorani@gmail.com
Visits: 416
Downloads: 32
Creative Commons License
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs | Vol. 3, No. 1 | May 2017
Shameer Modongal
This paper analyzes the importance of self-determination in international relations. It explains the puzzle why some small regions or group of people are ready to be small states by separating from big powerful states. The self-determination of a nation is preferable to the people than a military power of the large state. The military power of a state may not translate into a better life of people. So people’s empowerment cannot be treated the necessary outcome of state’s military power. When one group of people feel as marginalized in national policy making and its implications, they show a secessionist tendency. This paper contends that people may prefer their ideology, identity and self-determination than the power of the state
Identity Politics; International Relations; Power; Secessionist Movements; Self-Determination

1. Anaya, S. James. "The Capacity of International Law to Advance Ethnic or Nationality Rights Claims." Iowa L. Rev. 75, no. 4 (1990): 837- 844
2. Beran, Harry. "A liberal theory of secession." Political Studies 32, no. 1 (1984): 21-31.
3. Birch, Anthony H. "Another liberal theory of secession." Political Studies 32, no. 4 (1984): 596-602.
4. Buchanan, Allen, "Self-determination and the Right to Secede.", Journal of International Affairs 45, no. 2, (1991): 347-365
5. Franck, Thomas M. "The emerging right to democratic governance." The American Journal of International Law 86, no. 1 (1992): 46-91.
6. Holsti, Kalevi J. "The concept of power in the study of international relations." Background 7, no. 4 (1964): 179-194.
7. Horowitz, Donald L. "Self: Determination: Politics, Philosophy and Law", in National Self- Determination and Secession, edited by Margaret Moore, 181-214. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 1988
8. Li, Jieli. "State fragmentation: Toward a theoretical understanding of the territorial power of the state." Sociological Theory 20, no. 2 (2002): 139-156.
9. Lustick, Ian S., Dan Miodownik, and Roy J. Eidelson. "Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it?." American Political Science Review 98, no. 02 (2004): 209-229.
10. Miller, David, "Secession and the Principle of Nationality”, in National Self- Determination and Secession, edited by Margaret Moore, 62-79. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 1988
11. Moltchanova, Anna. National self-determination and justice in multinational states. Vol. 5. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
12. Moore, Margaret, ed. National self-determination and secession. OUP Oxford, 1998.
13. Nuruzzaman, Mohammed. "Federalism and State Disintegration-United Pakistan, 1947-1971: Some Historical Lessons for Afghanistan and Iraq." Journal of Asian and African Studies 45, no. 5 (2010): 504-521.
14. Organski, A. F. K. 1968. World politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968
15. Waltz, Kenneth N. "Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Essay." New York 1954.
16. Weller, Marc. Escaping the self-determination trap. Brill, 2008.
Circle of Friends
Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the editors or publisher.
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs
is published by the Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License