Bama Andika Putra
Bama Andika Putra is a lecturer of International Relations in Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia. He graduated from the University of Melbourne Postgraduate School Of Government, after being awarded a scholarship from the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP). Bama has written several articles in the field of Indonesian Foreign Policy, ASEAN and Regionalism, Regional Conflict Management, and International Conflict. He currently teaches several courses in Universitas Hasanuddin, including Indonesian Foreign Policy, Southeast Asian Regional Dynamics, Terrorism and Transnational Crime, and Peace and Conflict Studies.
Visits: 528
Downloads: 42
Creative Commons License
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs | Vol. 5, No. 2 | September 2019
Bama Andika Putra
The US faces many dilemmas in facing an XXI century China. The recent crisis that has occurred in the South China Sea and issues related to the trade war between the two global powers have significantly divided the positions of both states in world affairs. The US policy of engagement and coercion, forcing China into the US liberal order has shown slow progress. Therefore, it is critical to re-evaluate the US foreign policy strategy in facing an XXI century China, which shows discontent towards the values that are promoted by the US. This paper critically analyzes the US foreign policy approach to China, provides key elements of its success, and concludes the major issues faced throughout the process of interacting with the modern global superpower known as China.
US Foreign Policy; Liberal International Order; China; Bilateral Relations; US-China Relations

1.Ba, A. D. (2011). Staking Claims and Making Waves in the South China Sea: How Troubled Are the Waters? Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 33 (3).
2. Bijian, Z. (2005). China's Peaceful Rise to Great-Power Status. Foreign Affairs, 18.
3.Glaser, B. S., & Medeiros, E. S. (2007). The Changing Ecology of Foreign Policy-Making in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of "Peaceful Rise." The China Quarterly, 291-310.
4.Buzan, B. (2010). China in International Society: Is 'Peaceful Rise' Possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3 (1), 5-36.
5.Baker, P. (2002). Human Rights, Europe, and the People's Republic of China. The China Quarterly, 169, 45-63.
6.Nanto, D. K., & Manyin, M. E. (2011). China-North Korea Relations. North Korean Review, 7 (2), 94-101.
7.Ji, Y. (2001). China and North Korea: A Fragile Relationship of Strategic Convenience. 10 (28), 387-398.
8.Glaser, C. (2011). Will China's Rise Lead to War? Why Realism Does Not Mean Pessimism. Foreign Affairs, 90(2), 80-91.
9.Xuetong, Y. (2006). The Rise of China and its Power Status. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 1 (1), 5-33.
10.Xuetong, Y. (2010). The Rise of China in Chinese Eyes. Journal of Contemporary China, 10 (26), 33-39.
11.Shambaugh, D. (2014). China Goes Global: The Partial Power. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14 (2), 328-330.
12.Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The Rise of China and the Future of the West. Foreign Affairs, 87.
13.Garver, J. (2015). The Sino-American Alliance: Nationalist China and American Cold War Strategy in Asia. New York, US: Routledge.
14.Xia, Y. (2006). Negotiating with the Enemy: U.S-China Talks during the Cold War, 1949-1972. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
15.Sutter, R. G. (2017). US-China Relations. New York, US: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
16.Mincai, Y. (2013). China's Responses to the Compulsory Arbitration on the South China Sea Dispute: Legal Effects and Policy Options. Ocean Development & International Law, 45 (1), 1-16.
Circle of Friends
Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the editors or publisher.
Journal of Liberty and International Affairs
is published by the Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License